4658089e21
126 plikow (md, yaml, sh, py) odwolywalo sie do sciezek sprzed migracji.
15 markdown-linkow [..](..) -> policzona sciezka WZGLEDNA wobec pliku
odsylajacego (wczesniej czesc z nich byla repo-root-relative i nie
rozwiazywala sie z katalogu, w ktorym lezala)
200 odwolan tekstowych (backticki, proza, yaml, importy w kodzie)
-> nowa sciezka repo-root-relative, zgodnie z konwencja repo
5 linkow rodzenstwa (gole nazwy plikow, np. "](DEPLOY.md)") — dzialaly
tylko w starym katalogu; przeliczone recznie
Objete m.in.: CLAUDE.md (scripts/onboard/README.md -> kb/runbooks/
node-onboarding-tool.md, docs/backlog.md -> kb/phases/backlog.md),
README.md, .claude/skills/, 20 session logow, kod jobow.
Ostatnie 5 odwolan pochodzi z tresci wciagnietej rebasem z origin/master
(session log 2026-07-31, override node-agenta na SOLARII, dwie pozycje
backlogu) — wskazywaly na docs/incidents/, docs/kb/modules/ i
services/narty27/README.md sprzed migracji.
Dodany wzajemny link miedzy kb/services/control-plane.md (stub kodu)
a kb/subsystems/control-plane.md (opis, deprecated) — dwa dokumenty o tym
samym systemie, latwe do pomylenia.
Weryfikacja na 790 plikach: 0 odwolan do starych sciezek,
0 martwych linkow markdown. Lint OKF: 190/190 plikow ZGODNE.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
47 lines
2.4 KiB
Python
47 lines
2.4 KiB
Python
"""Startup invariant -- module 5 phase 4 (kb/phases/kb-m5-faza4.md, §2 decision 2,
|
|
"twardy inwariant"): the configured `EMBED_MODEL` must already be the model behind the active
|
|
embeddings in both `document_chunk` and `document_summary`, or kb-query refuses to start
|
|
(crash-loop, visible via container restarts in monitoring -- deliberately loud, never a silent
|
|
mismatch). There is no per-request model choice today, so this is the only place drift could
|
|
sneak in (someone changes `EMBED_MODEL` without a re-index).
|
|
|
|
`document_summary.model` is the LLM that WROTE the summary (`claude-haiku-4-5` / `gemma3:12b`
|
|
-- see `services/kb-postgres/init/004_summaries.sql`), not the embedder; the column that
|
|
records which model embedded the summary text is `embedding_model`. The plan's SQL sketch for
|
|
this check named `model` for both tables -- checking `document_summary.model` against
|
|
`EMBED_MODEL` would never match (summaries are never written by `bge-m3`) and the service would
|
|
refuse to start unconditionally. Checked live against kb-postgres@PIHA on 2026-07-22 before
|
|
writing this: `document_summary.model` holds `{claude-haiku-4-5, gemma3:12b}`,
|
|
`document_summary.embedding_model` holds `{bge-m3}` -- `embedding_model` is the correct column.
|
|
"""
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import asyncpg
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ModelInvariantError(RuntimeError):
|
|
"""The configured EMBED_MODEL is absent from document_chunk/document_summary embeddings."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def validate_embed_model(conn: asyncpg.Connection, embed_model: str) -> None:
|
|
chunk_rows = await conn.fetch(
|
|
"SELECT DISTINCT model FROM document_chunk "
|
|
"WHERE excluded_reason IS NULL AND embedding IS NOT NULL"
|
|
)
|
|
chunk_models = {r["model"] for r in chunk_rows}
|
|
if embed_model not in chunk_models:
|
|
raise ModelInvariantError(
|
|
f"EMBED_MODEL={embed_model!r} not found among document_chunk.model "
|
|
f"of active embeddings ({sorted(chunk_models) or 'none'})"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
summary_rows = await conn.fetch(
|
|
"SELECT DISTINCT embedding_model FROM document_summary WHERE embedding IS NOT NULL"
|
|
)
|
|
summary_embed_models = {r["embedding_model"] for r in summary_rows}
|
|
if embed_model not in summary_embed_models:
|
|
raise ModelInvariantError(
|
|
f"EMBED_MODEL={embed_model!r} not found among document_summary.embedding_model "
|
|
f"of active embeddings ({sorted(summary_embed_models) or 'none'})"
|
|
)
|